Monday, October 28, 2019

I like Beto, but he's kind of an idiot; here's why:

Every time Beto O'Rourke looks into his shaving mirror, I'm reasonably sure he sees Jack Kennedy staring back at him, and that's a problem. The left has dreamt, deep down in their hearts, of banning assault rifles and taking them away from those that already owned them since long before anybody knew where Columbine was. Beto said it out loud and proud, and it was going to be mandatory. This was going to be his man-on-the-moon-by-the-end-of-the-decade moment, and he just knew it. 

That's not going to happen, not in the way he described, no way, no how. That's why you haven't heard much from him since.

A lofty, worthy ideal to be sure, but impossible. However, a slight modification of his plan would appeal even to some serious wackadoos. My humble suggestion follows... First off, mandatory confiscation of guns will never work; you have to make it voluntary, and nothing works better than cold hard cash. Buybacks won't work unless you make them attractive. I propose a buyback at double, triple, or even quadruple the going rate of what they sell for. Every one out of the public is a win. Now, for every one still out there, be it in private hands or in a gun shop, institute a transfer tax that would make the bluest tax-and-spend Democrat cringe. If you absolutely feel you need an AR-15, you can get one, assuming you are willing to 1) pay through the nose for it, 2) submit to the most invasive background check you've ever had in your life, and 3) accept the fact that if your particular AR-15 is used in the commission of a crime, you are, not to put too fine a point on it, fucked. It won't even matter if it wasn't you pulling the trigger; it will actually be worse on you if it wasn't.

This, of course, is stolen right out of the GOP playbook. In case you didn't recognize it, I'd like to see the left do to assault rifles what the right wants to do to abortions; they're perfectly legal to have under your 2nd Amendment rights. You just might not find them convenient to get. You might not be comfortable with giving up the amount of information you'll have to to get one. You just plain might not be able to afford one. Sound familiar?

In conclusion, Beto, you've got good intentions; I respect that. Your problem lies with your average American not liking being told he can't have something, especially when a very broad reading of the Constitution tells them they're "entitled" to it. And that is you fail...

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Hey, we got one Republican to join us. Gather your torches and pitchforks!!!

You've been hearing tons of commentary about wanting to impeach Donald Trump. I know, so have I. A whole gallon of gasoline just got poured on to that fire courtesy of one Rep. Justin Amash (R). You've been hearing a lot from the younger members of the Democratic caucus wanting to push ahead, regardless of the caution that leadership members like Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer have been espousing. I've heard that too.

Now, let me tell you why that would be a really, REALLY bad idea.

If you had wanted to impeach Trump, you had a razor thin window of time to do it. It still wouldn't have been your best move, but if you were going for the optics of change, you could have done this: use the period of time between the midterm elections and January to have your staffs draw up articles of impeachment and have them ready to go, and then bring it to a vote on the very first day you are in power. Hell, you should have brought it up as your first order of business.

My friends, that train has sailed.

The instant that the conventional wisdom became "Let's wait for the Mueller Report", the window for impeachment, even as a symbolic gesture, slammed shut. Now, it's way too late. Maybe, if the Mueller Report had come up with something like "When our third corroborating witness to what President Trump did to that sheep on top of the Resolute Desk provided us with 8x10 glossy photos, we knew we were on the right track...", you could have had something. No such luck. Barr got a chance to muddy the waters, the "big lie" of "No Collusion, No Obstruction" got a chance to take hold, and, and the most basic point of all, most people wouldn't understand the law if you hit them with it, fouled up everything Mueller was trying to do. The fact that there is all sorts of legal wrangling about the Mueller Report now, plus even more regarding the underlying evidence of the Report and the other records that the House Committees are trying to subpeona makes it, I'm sorry to say, almost useless for your purposes. But, like everything else in the universe, your biggest enemy was, and still is, Time.

It seems that every Democrat that got a whiff of their own musk and thought "My god, I smell positively Kennedy today!" is running to be the Democratic nominee for President. There are so many of them that the first debate is only a month away, almost a year and a half before election day. Necessary, of course, as the great majority of these folks are not going to get anywhere near shouting distance of making a serious, successful run and the dead weight needs to be winnowed down. But the first debate is important: we went through everybody's speeches and interviews and Joe Biden's "will he or won't he" phase, but when the first debate happens, it is officially GAME ON. When that happens, Donald Trump becomes not only President but also the Republican nominee-apparent for President. (I have no idea who Bill Weld thinks of when he smells his own musk, but more power to him.) If, after The Campaign has begun in earnest, the Democrats impeach him then, that will do more to energize that core group of lemmings that would follow Trump off the nearest cliff than a thousand Nuremburg rallies could dream of. Trump is never more dangerous than when he is being attacked and he can portray himself as The Innocent Victim to his base, and if you don't think he won't do that full throttle if the Democrats give him the opportunity, you haven't been paying attention.

Back to Justin Amash for a minute. (Warning: this is going to sound a tiny bit conspiracy theory; bear with me.) Who among us thinks that a Freedom Caucus, Tea Party Republican gives a damn what the liberal Left thinks or wants? Who thinks that, aside from wanting Trump impeached, that Justin Amash and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez agree on ANYTHING? Right, exactly nobody. Now, Justin Amash easily could be simply a very honorable man and is willing to speak his beliefs, regardless of the censure it might bring from his party and the extreme difficulty it will introduce into any reelection campaign. Then I remembered he's Republican, so that can't possibly be his angle. So what is? Maybe, just maybe, he's got deep rooted Conservative cred coupled with being in a very safe red district that he can afford to go off the reservation for a good cause: that if he goes turncoat, maybe he can goad the Democrats into blindly rushing ahead with impeachment, yelling "The Republicans are cracking and turning against him! Now's our chance!" If they do it, he can help lead them into a Democratic Charge of the Light Brigade and give Trump just the opportunity he wants; if they don't fall for it, Amash has a year and a half for this small blip on the radar to drop out of the collective memory of his district.

So, what should the Democrats do, you ask? As much as it may pain you to hear, they're doing it now. Neal and Nadler are flinging subpoenas at Trump and his minions, they're hauling them to court, and Nancy Pelosi is talking around impeachment. Not talking about it, mind you, but around it. "We'll see what happens in the courts, nothing is off the table", etc. These kind of tactics are, mark my words, making Trump apoplectic. The potential threat of impeachment is way, way worse than having the punch actually land and dealing with it. You, I, and even he knows that he will never be convicted in the Senate. He wants to get it over with, and go into Victim Mode. He wants nothing more than to keep saying "No Collusion, No Obstruction" and, in the manner of "There's no place like home", have it be true. But it isn't, and he's dying the death of a thousand cuts because of it. Patience, dear readers.

A focused, under attack and fighting back Donald Trump will win reelection in 2020. A distracted, worried Donald Trump won't. And that's what will get him out of the White House.

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Shh... Come here. It's going to be ok.

Ok. I cleared everyone else out; it's just you and me here, and we need to talk. Now I know everything that's happened with the Mueller report and what Barr did to it looks bad. I get it! The right wing is doing victory laps and dancing jigs, looking for their pound of flesh from everyone who thinks did them wrong, and you're a little bummed.

Snap out of it!

There was no way that this was going to end with Mueller taking his report to Capitol Hill, and the House and Senate immediately lighting torches and grabbing pitchforks and marching to 1600 Pennsylvania; I hope you knew that. This was going to end exactly the way it ended: Mueller delivering his report, whoever was AG at the time declaring "Nothing to see here!", followed up by subpeonas and legal battles we haven't even begun to see yet.

It's ok. Really.

Some bad people have gone to jail, or are going soon. The Trump Foundation (aka The Family ATM) has been shuttered. This administration's days of ignoring or simply being rubber-stamped by 100% of Congress are over. And people are forgetting one important thing: Everyone is talking about the Mueller report, and no one has seen it yet; they've seen AG Barr's Cliff Notes version of it.

Imagine this scenario: You're taking a history of film class and you find out right before class that there will be a quiz on The Godfather which, inexplicably, you have never seen. (Just go with me here.) You immediately go to your phone and read the plot summary under the Wikipedia entry for The Godfather, to get the basic plot line down. Now, you may glean just enough to pass your quiz, you may not. One thing is for sure, you're missing a hell of a lot of details that Francis Ford Coppolla probably felt were important. Further complicating things is that the Wikipedia entry could have been written by somebody that loved the movie or somebody that hated the movie; with only a few minutes before class, you didn't have a lot of time or choice in the matter.

That's where we're at now. We haven't seen the Mueller report. We've seen the Wikipedia entry about the Mueller report, written by somebody who 1) wrote it in a very short amount time and 2) wasn't a fan. Until we get the chance to pop some popcorn and go over the whole thing two or three times and then break off into discussion groups about which Trump kid is Fredo, we haven't gotten the whole experience Francis Ford Mueller wants us to have.

The wheels turn slowly, but we've made it this long. Hang in there.